I am interested in exploring potential options for repurposing the Hungerford School property to serve as a commemorative space for the former educational center, envisioning it as a sustainable institution such as a museum, school, or innovative community center. This initiative aims to revitalize Eatonville by honoring its history while also providing a platform for the future aspirations of the young Black community. How can Public History contribute to the ‘land back’ campaign and the quest for a new purpose for the Hungerford School property and Eatonville?
In his book Public History: A Textbook of Practice, chapter 12 discusses the Civic Engagement and Social Justice emphasizes the role of public historians in serving the community. Cauvin talks about public historians who “perform public services”[1] illustrates various perspectives from fellow public historians, highlighting their diverse roles and responsibilities. While some argue that history can help improve the present and future, others emphasize its role in understanding the complexities of contemporary issues. However, I contend that without a thorough understanding of historical processes and their implications, it is challenging to apply historical insights to current challenges effectively.
Moving from civic engagement to activism, public historians embrace their role as advocates for marginalized groups whose histories have often been overlooked or undervalued. They strive to amplify the voices of these communities and address social and economic injustices through historical interpretation and advocacy.
In the context of the Hungerford School property and Eatonville, public historians can play a crucial role in reclaiming and preserving the community’s heritage while advocating for its revitalization. By engaging with the ‘land back’ campaign, public historians can help facilitate discussions on land ownership and restitution, ensuring that the interests of the community are central to any redevelopment plans for the Hungerford School property. Additionally, by incorporating community input and promoting inclusive narratives, public historians can help shape a vision for Eatonville’s future that reflects its rich history and empowers its residents.
Public History serves as a catalyst for social change, empowering marginalized communities and advocating for justice. By actively engaging with issues of land ownership, heritage preservation, and community revitalization, public historians can contribute to a more equitable and inclusive future for Eatonville and beyond.
The professionalization of historical practices led to the emergence of applied history, where public historians serve as consultants across various fields like preservation, museums, and litigation. Thomas Cauvin highlights in chapter 13 Historians as Consultants and Advisors, how they navigate ethical challenges, balancing responsibilities to employers and the public.
Public historians face significant challenges and ethical dilemmas in entrepreneurial and corporate contexts. Cauvin refers to the NCPH (National Council of Public History) who designed in 1982 was supposed to design a new Code of Ethics which states in 2007 that “Public historians should be fully cognizant of the purpose…for which their research is intended, recognizing that research-based decisions and actions may have long-term consequences.”[2] This reference links to Cauvin’s argument that the commercialization of history clashes with traditional principles, raising concerns about the profession’s integrity. Contracts, essential for consultants, can both protect and constrain historians, impacting research integrity and the accuracy of the final product. Ethical tensions arise as historians balance client expectations, confidentiality, and professional responsibilities, raising questions about historical research legitimacy in commercial settings.
Historians in legal contexts, especially as expert witnesses, encounter diverse challenges and ethical considerations. They must possess strong methodological skills and effective communication abilities to present complex historical contexts to judges and juries. Unlike consultants, expert witnesses offer opinions openly in court, impacting case outcomes. Historians must balance their professional integrity with legal requirements, sometimes diverging from scholarly standards.
The involvement of historians in legal proceedings presents complex ethical dilemmas. They face pressure to align testimony with client interests, risking distortion of historical accounts. Historians must navigate conflicts of interest and ensure transparency regarding compensation and access to sources, balancing legal process demands with research integrity.
Federal historians play diverse roles within agencies, facing challenges in gaining recognition and navigating relationships with academic historians. Despite varied roles, they contribute to institutional memory through collecting records and conducting research.
Public policy greatly benefits from historians’ involvement, providing historical context, analyzing past decisions, and offering insights into current policies’ long-term effects. Historians bridge policymakers with historical perspectives, though tensions exist between pragmatic and politically wary historians. Historical analysis enriches policymaking by offering nuanced understandings and potential solutions, emphasizing contextualization and unique circumstances. Training programs equip historians with skills for effective policymaking engagement.
Historians’ involvement in policymaking extends beyond advisory roles, actively shaping policy discussions and decisions through interdisciplinary collaborations and practical opportunities. Overall, historians enrich decision-making processes by providing critical insights and fostering informed and ethical policymaking.
Generally, Thomas Cauvin provides in his book a good idea how public historians are involved in public issues, what skills they need to have, and what dilemmas they have to face with their engagement. Cauvin produces throughout the book a vast number of references which are occurring as mosaic-pieces which, all put together, suppose to provide a comprehensive picture. Unfortunately, they support to cover a lot of scenarios for public historians but leaves us with the question of the position of ‘applied historians’ and historians when they’re part of public activism or movements.
- How does Thomas Cauvin’s “Public History: A Textbook of Practice” translate theoretical concepts into practical applications, particularly concerning the involvement of public historians in real-world issues like the repurposing of historical sites such as the Hungerford School property?
- While Cauvin extensively discusses the roles and dilemmas faced by public historians, particularly in Chapter 13 regarding their involvement as consultants and advisors, what specific strategies or recommendations does he offer for navigating the ethical challenges posed by commercialization, legal contexts, and governmental roles?
Top of Form
[1] Thomas Cauvin. Public History: A Textbook of Practice. New York; Routledge, 2016, p. 230
[2] Cauvin p.252
jochenriehmblog.wordpress.com 
Leave a comment